<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for sellmic.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sellmic.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sellmic.com/blog</link>
	<description>Augusto's corner of art, code and fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:32:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hidden Java 7 Features &#8211; System and Process CPU Load Monitoring by sagar</title>
		<link>http://sellmic.com/blog/2011/07/21/hidden-java-7-features-cpu-load-monitoring/comment-page-1/#comment-19095</link>
		<dc:creator>sagar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sellmic.com/blog/?p=612#comment-19095</guid>
		<description>osBean.getSystemCpuLoad();   gives the CPULoad similarly i want to get the CPU Main Memory (RAM) Usage????? Can anybody suggest how to get it????  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>osBean.getSystemCpuLoad();   gives the CPULoad similarly i want to get the CPU Main Memory (RAM) Usage????? Can anybody suggest how to get it????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook Friend Lists suck when compared to Google+ Circles by dudedudude</title>
		<link>http://sellmic.com/blog/2011/07/01/facebook-friend-lists-suck-when-compared-to-googleplus-circles/comment-page-1/#comment-19049</link>
		<dc:creator>dudedudude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sellmic.com/blog/?p=478#comment-19049</guid>
		<description>are you guys kidding me? let&#039;s be honest - lists and circles are the same thing, just in a different format. you can call them whatever you like and make it look as different as you like, but they are the same thing. 
 
one thing i really hate is how in google+ you HAVE to put people in circles. what if i just want to add someone and dont care about lists or circles? if i dont want to talk to someone, why would i add them to my social network anyway? why does it have to be so annoying and complicated?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you guys kidding me? let&#039;s be honest &#8211; lists and circles are the same thing, just in a different format. you can call them whatever you like and make it look as different as you like, but they are the same thing. </p>
<p>one thing i really hate is how in google+ you HAVE to put people in circles. what if i just want to add someone and dont care about lists or circles? if i dont want to talk to someone, why would i add them to my social network anyway? why does it have to be so annoying and complicated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hidden Java 7 Features &#8211; System and Process CPU Load Monitoring by harshana</title>
		<link>http://sellmic.com/blog/2011/07/21/hidden-java-7-features-cpu-load-monitoring/comment-page-1/#comment-18814</link>
		<dc:creator>harshana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sellmic.com/blog/?p=612#comment-18814</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent work. Keep it up mate. 
 
BTW, I am interesting on this and I like to have a look at the implementation. Could you please share it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent work. Keep it up mate. </p>
<p>BTW, I am interesting on this and I like to have a look at the implementation. Could you please share it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hidden Java 7 Features &#8211; System and Process CPU Load Monitoring by CPU usage without JNI</title>
		<link>http://sellmic.com/blog/2011/07/21/hidden-java-7-features-cpu-load-monitoring/comment-page-1/#comment-18790</link>
		<dc:creator>CPU usage without JNI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sellmic.com/blog/?p=612#comment-18790</guid>
		<description>[...] if (typeof ord==&#039;undefined&#039;) {ord=Math.random()*10000000000000000;}document.write(&#039;&#039;);          May not be as comprehensive as you like, and I haven&#039;t used them myself, but java 7 has some updates to get the Cpu load: Monitoring and Management Interface for the Java Platform You also might want to check out this blog: Hidden Java 7 Features &#8211; System and Process CPU Load Monitoring @ sellmic.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if (typeof ord==&#039;undefined&#039;) {ord=Math.random()*10000000000000000;}document.write(&#039;&#039;);          May not be as comprehensive as you like, and I haven&#039;t used them myself, but java 7 has some updates to get the Cpu load: Monitoring and Management Interface for the Java Platform You also might want to check out this blog: Hidden Java 7 Features &#8211; System and Process CPU Load Monitoring @ sellmic.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iTunes AppleSyncNotifier error, how to fix by Tom Grimes</title>
		<link>http://sellmic.com/blog/2011/04/26/itunes-applesyncnotifier-error-how-to-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-18753</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Grimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 03:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sellmic.com/blog/?p=460#comment-18753</guid>
		<description>Awesome!  Thank You! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome!  Thank You!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook Friend Lists suck when compared to Google+ Circles by Justin</title>
		<link>http://sellmic.com/blog/2011/07/01/facebook-friend-lists-suck-when-compared-to-googleplus-circles/comment-page-1/#comment-18657</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sellmic.com/blog/?p=478#comment-18657</guid>
		<description>In all that I have researched and read, in an attempt to model my real life relationships with my separate families (ex &amp; Current) within Facebook, nobody seems to address what seems glaringly obvious: Facebook&#039;s core database design is deficient. All the work that Facebook is doing (bodge job fix-ups- Lists) and Facebook&#039;s CEO&#039;s pronouncements that the Age of Privacy is over,  comes across like a &quot;Cat trying to hide it&#039;s crap on a Marble Floor&quot;. They cannot model real-life social relationships. 
It&#039;s not so much about what &quot;information&quot; we choose to &quot;post&quot; and the choices we make about who sees those posts - That&#039;s an easy fix for Facebook!  It&#039;s more about the &quot;Who our Friends Are&quot; and &quot;How do we manage our Different Personas&quot;.  I don&#039;t know whether Google+ got it right with their &quot;Circles&quot; but the concept of &quot;Circles of Friends&quot; is not new to anybody - Social Circles.   
 
So, a simple and common &quot;social tangle&quot;:  Your ex-wife and your child of 8 and the related circle of friends.  Your new wife and your new baby and the new circle of friends.  In your real life they are both separate circles. Do you want the photos of the new baby posted by Granny thrust in the face of your eight-year old from your previous marriage??  Do you not want to be able to tell your eight-year old that she&#039;s the most special person in your life without your new wife turning around and accusing you of not loving your new baby?    
 
Facebook has no sensible model for representing such &quot;real life&quot; social situations.  So their answer is: &quot;Make it all Public&quot;!! 
 
Some have said that Facebook&#039;s Zuckerberg is being arrogant in his assertion that being more public in our lives is a necessary social development. I suggest that his comments simply reflect his immaturity .- he is a child (albeit smart) with no life experience. 
 
Facebook, stop making excuses and Change to be what you purport:  a solution to managing real-life (social) relationships via the internet. 
 
 
 
 
        </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all that I have researched and read, in an attempt to model my real life relationships with my separate families (ex &amp; Current) within Facebook, nobody seems to address what seems glaringly obvious: Facebook&#039;s core database design is deficient. All the work that Facebook is doing (bodge job fix-ups- Lists) and Facebook&#039;s CEO&#039;s pronouncements that the Age of Privacy is over,  comes across like a &quot;Cat trying to hide it&#039;s crap on a Marble Floor&quot;. They cannot model real-life social relationships.<br />
It&#039;s not so much about what &quot;information&quot; we choose to &quot;post&quot; and the choices we make about who sees those posts &#8211; That&#039;s an easy fix for Facebook!  It&#039;s more about the &quot;Who our Friends Are&quot; and &quot;How do we manage our Different Personas&quot;.  I don&#039;t know whether Google+ got it right with their &quot;Circles&quot; but the concept of &quot;Circles of Friends&quot; is not new to anybody &#8211; Social Circles.   </p>
<p>So, a simple and common &quot;social tangle&quot;:  Your ex-wife and your child of 8 and the related circle of friends.  Your new wife and your new baby and the new circle of friends.  In your real life they are both separate circles. Do you want the photos of the new baby posted by Granny thrust in the face of your eight-year old from your previous marriage??  Do you not want to be able to tell your eight-year old that she&#039;s the most special person in your life without your new wife turning around and accusing you of not loving your new baby?    </p>
<p>Facebook has no sensible model for representing such &quot;real life&quot; social situations.  So their answer is: &quot;Make it all Public&quot;!! </p>
<p>Some have said that Facebook&#039;s Zuckerberg is being arrogant in his assertion that being more public in our lives is a necessary social development. I suggest that his comments simply reflect his immaturity .- he is a child (albeit smart) with no life experience. </p>
<p>Facebook, stop making excuses and Change to be what you purport:  a solution to managing real-life (social) relationships via the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

